There’s no other piece of kit that’s loved or hated as fiercely as a pair of mud encrusted boots. If they fit well and are good for the job at hand, they’re almost out of mind. But if they don’t – boy, do your feet let you know about. Not surprisingly they fill the pages of most forums and “ask the gear guy” columns.
Here are some thoughts on boots I’ve loved as well as exerts from and links to reviews and buyers guides.
Here are some thoughts on boots I’ve loved as well as exerts from and links to reviews and buyers guides.
My all-time favorite 3-Season hiking boot: The Karrimor KSB 300
Description: A fabric covered boot with a Gore-tex liner and Vibram sole.
U.K. Price: About 80 pounds ($140) in stores, half that if bought online from Amazon.co.uk (which you can do below or by clicking here: Karrimor Men’s ksb 300 eVent© Hiking Boot
In short:
Strong points: comfortable out of the box, light and waterproof.
Weak points: Don’t last as long as pure leather uppers and the waterproof liner also cuts its longevity.
The newest versions of the boot now use eVent fabric, which some will say beats Goretex in breathability.
When I talk about these boots I have to gush. They’re a British epic made by a legend of a company that has since gone bust and been rescued. The boots have lasted me about 5 years, taken me to three continents and walked on everything from desert to glaciers and deep snow at almost 6000 meters. Their first great point is that they’re relatively light (about 700 grams a boot) and very comfortable, right out of the box. I bought them in a hurry just days before a weekend’s hiking in the hills when I discovered a great big hole in my previous pair (Hi-Tec something or other – and the last of their boots I ever bought). The fitted like a glove, didn’t need real breaking in and cased barely a blister in my first few days of hard hiking.
They give great ankle support, don’t compress the Achilles tendon and breath pretty well for what they are – which is a weird hybrid of fabric and a gore liner. The waterproof liner, when it works, works great. You can wade through streams, stomp in mud, and walk along a wet, grassy path all day without and water getting in.
They give great ankle support, don’t compress the Achilles tendon and breath pretty well for what they are – which is a weird hybrid of fabric and a gore liner. The waterproof liner, when it works, works great. You can wade through streams, stomp in mud, and walk along a wet, grassy path all day without and water getting in.
Like all breathable lined boots, a very sweaty foot will pump out more water than the liner can get rid off quickly, so a pair of wicking socks is essential to keep you feet nice and dry. Damp feet in hot weather is probably the most common complaint you’ll hear about them.
The down side, is that the liner does have a limited life. Once that gives up, there’s no way you can keep your feet dry. Unlike a leather boot, the fabric on these will soak out and let water through. Waterproof coatings like Nikwax help slow it wetting out but it won’t keep the water out in seriously damp conditions.
The other weak point to these boots is that the fabric is less durable than top quality leather. Mine were badly scuffed and showing their age on the uppers after a long trip to Nepal. That said, they still held up pretty well. The Vibram sole gives good grip and wears well too.
I replaced the stock inners (it also comes with volume adjusters in the box) with a pair of Superfeet, but that’s got a lot to do with my feet and the fact that I use aftermarket inners in just about all my shoes and boots.)
I replaced the stock inners (it also comes with volume adjusters in the box) with a pair of Superfeet, but that’s got a lot to do with my feet and the fact that I use aftermarket inners in just about all my shoes and boots.)
These boots don’t take full crampons and aren’t stiff enough for a day of kicking steps in snow (I’ve done it and would prefer a far stiffer boot for that next time). All in all, they’re great boots for light hiking all the way through serious trekking and multi-day backpacking with a heavy load. I wouldn’t recommend them for extended walking in cold conditions on snow and ice. For that I’d look to boots in the class of Scarpa Manta or La Sportiva Makalu which have heavier leather uppers and stiffer soles to accept a crampon.
This is what some other reviewers had to say about these hiking boots.
David Lynch at Trailwalk Gear Guides calls it:
A great boot at the price and well worth putting on your wish list.At this price and specification Karrimor have aimed the Solitude GTX right at the hillwalker who wants a great performing boot at a budget price.
Other boots in the same class (though in some cases a higher price range) include: Scarpa ZG65 XCR Hiking boot (100 pounds)
Raichle Men’s Scout (90 pounds)
Salomon Men’s Adventure Trek 7 (100 pounds)
Vasque Zephyr Hiking Boot (70 to 100 pounds)
Raichle Men’s Scout (90 pounds)
Salomon Men’s Adventure Trek 7 (100 pounds)
Vasque Zephyr Hiking Boot (70 to 100 pounds)
If you are looking to do more serious winter climbing though and need to wear crampons you may want to look at a genuine winter boot, which this really isn’t. I’ve written reviews on the La Sportiva Makalu and Scarpa Manta that you can read on this blog. If you are interested in serious high altitude climbing you may also want to read the article I’ve written on Scarpa’s Omega boots.
If you’ve owned or tested any of these boots please let me know and I’ll put your views up here.
*These prices were correct as of August 2005 from the Web site of a major U.K. retailer. Shopping on the Web or in the U.S. may yield lower prices.
UPDATE NOVEMBER 2009
I just bought another pair of Karrimor KSB 399 boots after my previous ones had worn out. I found them on special at Amazon for £45 pounds and fired off an order right away. One change is that the liner is now made from Event fabric rather than Gore-tex. I’ll keep you updated on whether they are as great as my old Karrimor boots were.
Finest and amazing variety of hiking shoes are available at Sportsmans Guide…
Trail running and hiking shoes have some advantages:
* They dry much quicker than heavy boots. I can walk a pair of NB’s dry in about two hours and they almost always dry over night.
* Better all purpose traction. Climbing shoes look like ballet slippers
* Increased range of motion allows a better friction grip while bouldering and rock scrambling.
* No break in period.
* More nimble hiking. I have crossed log bridges in groups where I was the only one wearing trail running shoes and the are much better.
* Cheaper, but maybe not in the long run..
* Oh yea – LIGHTER.
Boots do have some advantages:
* When you walk in an area with occasional puddles less than ankle deep they will keep your feet dry.
* The aggressive lug sole is the best traction on slick mud and ice.
* A stiff boot is needed for full crampons – but not the instep crampons.
* They keep your ankle from getting whacked by rocks in talus and stream crossings – but gaiters and a piece cut from your sleeping pad is more effective.
* Less rocks get in your shoes – but gaiters over NB’s are better.
* More durable than trail runners.
* Under a heavy pack a heavy sole with a substantial shank will prevent bruising the bottoms of your feet. But if you are carrying that much weight you should confine you hike to smooth and wide trails because the heavy load makes you very unstable. Bushwhacking or rock scrambling with a heavy load is dangerous.
best hiking shoes
All in all, they're great boots for light hiking all the way through serious trekking and multi-day backpacking with a heavy load. I wouldn't recommend them for extended walking in cold conditions on snow and ice.